JOHN WESSELS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES |
Since August 2018, the DRC has recorded more than 2500 cases of Ebola and, among them, more than 1700 deaths.
He had been Minister since January
2017. He wrote that Tshisekedi’s decision to remove him from heading the
country’s Ebola response was made without his knowledge while he was
supervising the response in the city of Goma, DRC, where a first Ebola case was
diagnosed 14 July.
“As a result of your decision to
oversee the response to the Ebola epidemic, and because I anticipate that this
decision will inevitably lead to a predictable outcry, I submit to you my resignation
as Health Minister,” Kalenga stated in the letter.
He said his ministry had communicated
daily on the situation in the ongoing outbreak “to reassure and show the world
that the country is managing this epidemic, thus preserving its reputation and
preventing negative socioeconomic effects on the impacted regions.”
In his letter, Kalenga attacked
efforts to launch trials of an experimental vaccine made by Johnson &
Johnson in the country. A Merck & Co. vaccine is already in use in DRC.
Tshisekedi’s administration had announced that
direct supervision of the Ebola response was being placed with a team of
experts under the direction of Jean Jacques Muyembe Tamfum, Director-General of
the DRC’s National Institute for Biomedical Research (NIBR) and a
microbiologist at the University of Kinshasa’s medical school. Tamfum has
studied Ebola and responded to outbreaks for more than 40 years.
The change in leadership came days
after the World Health Organization declared the DRC outbreak a Public
Health Emergency of International Concern.
Peter Piot, director of the London
School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, welcomed the move as a bold decision
to change strategy and bring the Ebola response under direct supervision.
. “The [Merck] vaccine currently used
in the context of this epidemic is the only one that has shown efficacy,”
Kalenga wrote, and it does so within 10 days. “It is fantastical to think that
the new vaccine being recommended (with two doses administered 56 days apart) …
could have a determinative effect on the epidemic that’s now underway,” Kalenga
wrote. He charged that those proposing the use of the J&J vaccine “have
shown a clear lack of ethics by intentionally hiding important information from
the health authorities.”
No comments:
Post a Comment